"Amerikanische Verhaeltnisse": Those Greedy Americans...

(By Ray D.)

New studies prove what generous, lucid, magnanimous, socially-conscious Europeans have known all along: Americans are evil, greedy, miserly capitalists bent on crushing the poor underclass. Free markets and a mistrust of government have made them into selfish gluttons and slobs. Only enlightened social-democracy can truly bring out the generosity and the kindness of the human spirit and ensure social justice...

...Whoops...just don't look at these findings reported on ABC News and 20/20 (this will be stictly verboten in all German media - SPIEGEL and Stern do not approve of these "amerikanische Verhaeltnisse"!):

"The fact that most of America's charitable gifts come from volunteers, not government, demonstrates that Americans are different from people in every other country.

"No other country comes close," said Arthur Brooks, a professor of public administration at Syracuse University. Brooks studies charitable giving and has a new book, "Who Really Cares: America's Charity Divide."

"The fact is that Americans give more than the citizens of any other country. … They also volunteer more," Brooks said. "Americans per capita individually give about three and a half times more money per year, than the French per capita. … Seven times more than the Germans and 14 times more than the Italians."

"Now, you might notice that these other countries have different average incomes or different tax systems," he said. "But even when you take that into account, Americans give 10 times more than the Italians. The fact is, that Americans give on a different scale than anybody else in the world."

(...) Carol Adelman at the Hudson Institute has studied how much Americans give privately in foreign aid. She says it's a myth that Americans are stingy.

"We're one of the most generous people in the world, and that's because of our private philanthropy," she said.

Adelman published her findings in the institute's "Index of Global Philanthropy," which found that while the U.S. government gave about $20 billion in foreign aid in 2004, privately, Americans gave $24.2 billion.

On top of that, immigrants in America send about $47 billion abroad to family members and home towns. That's anything but stingy.

"Americans give abroad like they do domestically, through their private institutions," Adelman said."

But the news only gets worse! The most evil class of Americans - religious conservatives who believe in small government - are by far the most generous. How could this be? John Stossel and Kristina Kendall report:

"It turns out that this idea that liberals give more…is a myth. Of the top 25 states where people give an above average percent of their income, 24 were red states in the last presidential election.

Arthur Brooks, the author of "Who Really Cares," says that "when you look at the data, it turns out the conservatives give about 30 percent more." He adds, "And incidentally, conservative-headed families make slightly less money."

And he says the differences in giving goes beyond money, pointing out that conservatives are 18 percent more likely to donate blood. He says this difference is not about politics, but about the different way conservatives and liberals view government.

"You find that people who believe it's the government's job to make incomes more equal, are far less likely to give their money away," Brooks says. In fact, people who disagree with the statement, "The government has a basic responsibility to take care of the people who can't take care of themselves," are 27 percent more likely to give to charity." (emphasis ours)

That can't be possible. Americans more generous than Germans? These facts are highly disturbing. They must be wrong. The American friends just don't get it. Social-democracy is the true path to happiness and charity. Just look at the mighty success of the run-away run-down German economy. We finally have growth again after years of stagnation and just managed to bring unemployment out of the double-digits and under the 4 million mark. Trade with Iran and Sudan is at records levels! Just imagine how the German economy will flourish when the national sales tax is increased from 16% to 19% this January!

Endnote: In the midst of the journalist-driven panic and bed-wetting over Iraq, Jonah Goldberg provides some interesting thoughts you are unlikely to encounter in German media. More here and here.

What the Country Doesn't Want to Hear

(Here is another guest submission by Cristian G. Enjoy! Do you agree that the capitalist system doesn't get a fair hearing in Germany? Want to add your voice to the conversation? Click here to learn about submitting articles)

I have several complaints about the media/politicians in Germany. But I think a big problem is the lack of debate. I mean real debate.

Most of the people in Germany agree that the welfare state is good, we should have many benefits, lots of vacation, etc. The problem is only, that those who oppose that (the conservatives), can't appear on TV and say that. These are the "illegals" right now (they are still left with the blogosphere, though).

I am sure that there are many people who want smaller government/smaller taxes. There are also publications that follow this line (for instance, the chief editor of Wirtschaftswoche is very conservative). But they don't reach the "usual guy". On TV, all that we see is "Germany must remain a social state". Of course, the anglo-saxon  capitalism has no chance to be implemented here (like the former chancellor said once proudly).

And the politicians and the press tend to maintain this myth, that no-one is really doing better than Germany (yes, obviously Germany has problems, but it is always stressed that the capitalists countries have bigger problems). They "preserve" the urban legends that circulate in the country about capitalism. If you ask someone on the street, you'll see that it is "obvious" that in US people need to have a second job to make a living, that the gap between the rich and the poor is getting wider, that you'll die on the street if you don't have medical insurance, that crime is so high in US, I think I can talk to people on the street the whole day long and not meet anyone who would know any different. And this should not make us wonder. When you hear the same things all day long, you will stop questioning them. You will just "know that for a fact".

George Orwell said once: "If freedom of speech means anything at all, it is the freedom to say things that people do not want to hear. " Hopefully we will get to hear the things we do not want to hear before it's too late.

Endnote from Ray: Nice article Cristian. Here is a question to consider in all of this: What is a "conservative" in today's world? How is the term "conservative" viewed differently in Germany and the USA? For example, one might call the CDU conservative in German terms, but not too many members of the CDU are willing to question the big government status quo. Perhaps only the Free-Democrats (FDP) are willing to do that, and then only with great caution. And what about the US? The Republicans hold power, but are we willing to call the present government "conservative" when it comes to fiscal matters? Please feel free to comment here...

Germany's Economic Growth: On a Stable Path...

Remember the days when the German media forecasted ultimate disaster for the U.S. economy as a result of President Bush's tax policy?

This just in: latest IMF statistics indeed prove the country's miserable economic condition.

The country is Germany.

Germany's economy is projected to grow a whopping 1.3 % in 2006, while the 2007 growth forecast virtually describes an exploding economy (+1.0 %) (U.S.: 3.4 % resp. 3.3 %). The 2006 and the 2007 IMF growth forecasts for Germany are the lowest of all countries and regions (page 2). The current 2007 forecast is 0,5 % below the September 2005 forecast for 2007. Things start bad and get worse.

(Out of pity, I will refrain from commenting on Germany's unemployment figures (table 1.4).)

I guess this sinister Bush guy somehow found a way to harm the German economy...

But there are brighter sides of the picture: German corporate taxes are second highest in Europe (36 % on average). Finally a financial statistic where Germany ranks among the top countries!

Arbeitsamt

Another area where Germany is tops: Unemployment administration!

In other news: German media congratulate President Bush for superior economic policies.

Well, probably NOT... After all, by definition this stupid cowboy from Texas can do no good...

Muslim Immigrants in Germany: Reaction to Discrimination

As we all know from the German media and from German politicians, the German Social Model with its many collectivist features is infinitely superior to the American capitalist system, which is based on profit orientation, selfishness, exploitation of the poor, etc., etc., etc.... Also frequently mentioned by representatives of Germany Inc. is the sad fate of American minorities, such as immigrants and "Neger", who suffer from century old racial prejudices of the ruling white Anglo-Saxon class. (No such thing happening in Germany, of course....)

Hmm... lately, there have been a few exception to the law of German superiority, such as sky-rocketing unemployment, lackluster economic growth, an ailing health system, a pay-as-you-go pension system that seems to be degenerating into oblivion faster than you can say "declining birth rates in Germany".

And then there is the immigration issue. The last ten years have seen an almost enthusiastic approval for increased immigration to Germany by the Left and the Liberal FDP "because we need immigration". The basic idea behind the "immigration now" approach (my expression) is the desire to have young immigrants pay for the pensions and health costs of Germany's increasingly aging population.

But there is unwelcome news from the Muslim front...

Letter from the teachers at the Ruetli Elementary School in Berlin to their state regulators:

...The composition of our student body has changed in recent years such that the highest proportion of students is now those with Arabic migrant backgrounds. It currently runs 34.9%, followed by 26.1% for those with Turkish migrant backgrounds. The overall portion of young people of non-German heritage amounts to 83.2%. The statistic shows that the proportion of pupils in our schools with Arabic migrant backgrounds has continually increased in recent years. (...)

We must say that the mood in some classes is currently characterized by aggressiveness, disrespect, and ignorance with regard to us adults. Necessary instructional material is brought to school by only a few pupils. The willingness to vandalize property is growing: doors are kicked in, waste paper baskets are abused as footballs, firecrackers are set off and picture frames are ripped from the hallway walls. (...)

In many classes the attitude during instruction is marked by a total rejection of the subject matter and by degrading demeanor. The teaching staff are totally unprotected; objects are thrown directly at them from the class, instructions are ignored. (...)

So far we haven’t gotten any support from the parents in our efforts to enforce norms and rules. Meeting dates are not kept, phone calls fail because of inadequate language comprehension. We’re at wit’s end, (...)

In most families, our pupils are the only ones who get up in the morning. How are we supposed to explain to them that it’s nevertheless important to be in school and to strive for graduation? (emphasis added) (Translation by Richard Bartholomew)

In other news:

The failure to integrate Muslim minorities in Europe constitutes a security risk for the US, the US state department’s undersecretary for European affairs Daniel Fried told a US senate committee.

Mr Fried said unemployment, discrimination and lack of integration among Europe’s Muslim communities had created an "audience" open to extremist messages, according to Reuters. (emphasis added)

Germany's cherished Social Model indeed has not achieved much in terms of integration of Muslim minorities (or other foreign minorities). Germany's top politician's names are as German as Sauerkraut and Knackwurst: Merkel, Platzeck, Westerwelle, Roth, Stoiber, Schmidt, Schäuble, Jung, Steinmeier, Seehofer, Beck, Rüttgers, Koch, Gerhardt, etc., etc. Business careers for immigrants are still the exception. University enrollment for students "with immigration background" runs way behind the immigrant's share for the "under 30" segment of the population.

For immigrants in all of Europe, there is no equivalent to the "American dream". As Leon de Winter in February 2006 wrote in WELT: "People who decide to go to the U.S. have chosen their dream - they want to become Americans. (...) In Europe, personal incentives for immigrants are vague and abstract" (our translation).

The issue of immigration - especially of people with a Muslim background - will turn into a nightmare for Europe.

(More on the Berlin school story...)

ARD's Weltspiegel: Hugo Chavez's Useful Media Idiots

(By Ray D.)

Recently, Hugo Chavez of Venezuela began an expensive propaganda campaign to distribute heating oil at reduced cost to low-income families along the east coast of the United States, particularly in Boston and New York. OK. So what's wrong with that? After all, heating oil prices have been rising rapidly of late. What's the big deal?

Well, for starters, Venezuela’s poor are exponentially worse off than their US counterparts. According to Venezuela’s own National Statistics Institute (INE), over half of the country, or 54% of all Venezuelans, live in poverty and 25% live in extreme poverty. Despite being the world's fifth largest oil exporter, Venezuela's per capita GDP is less than one-sixth that of the United States. Yet Chavez chooses to send millions abroad in a petty attempt to embarrass the Bush administration while his own people wallow in poverty. Senator John Sununu put it this way:

"Hugo Chavez has used the recent spike in heating oil costs as an opportunity to grandstand on the world stage," said Sununu. "He is selling Venezuela's assets at cut-rate prices while his country languishes in poverty and essential infrastructure crumbles. This is a disgrace, and New Hampshire should take no part in such a tragic and misguided charade."

And why is it that states dominated by Democrats for decades (Massachusetts and New York) can't take care of those in need? Aren't they supposed to be the most compassionate and socially-minded of all? Why would they need help from Comrade Chavez?

OK. So what does this have to do with the German media you say? Three weeks ago, Germany's most-watched, state-sponsored (ARD) program on foreign affairs, "Weltspiegel," broadcast a seven minute report entitled "Freezing Americans: Venezuela Helping." (WATCH)

"Freezing Americans, Venezuela Helping: (...)The employees at the Boston welfare office know that this year many people will freeze to death in their houses."

The report is the one-sided epitome of everything we have come to expect of the German media's useful idiot elite. America and Bush are predictably portrayed as uncaring, energy-wasting, neglectors of the poor while wreckless despots worldwide are given a free pass. Here's a translated excerpt:

"Help came, of all things, from someone who the Americans actually hate: From Venezuela's socialist President Chavez. He donated cheap heating oil - however just one delivery. 200 gallons, or a bit more than 750 liters - without the oil from Venezuela, many citizens in the northeast USA would be at an end. Because the one-time financial support of their own government has long been used up. The employees at the Boston welfare office know that this year many people will freeze to death in their houses. The Bush government has promised additional help but hasn't made the necessary monies available. John Drew from Boston's welfare office: "It's our natural disaster in this country. Now the cold winds are coming from Canada and the poor people are practically cut off from the energy supply. How are they supposed to survive?""

The poor would "be at an end" and "freeze to death"? How come masses of frozen corpses haven't been discovered in Northeastern states that did not receive the cheap Chavez oil? Hmmmm...

Conveniently, there is also no mention that Democratic opponents of President Bush and his party have long dominated New York and Massachusetts. Yet all the blame is comfortably heaped on the national government while local leftists like Joseph Kennedy are portrayed as heroic activists. Kennedy is interviewed on energy policy, but not a single representative of the Bush administration is presented to defend the government. And that isn't all. While introducing Kennedy, reporter Thomas Bergmann blatantly interjects his opinion into the report:

"Joseph Kennedy holds the unrestrained energy policy of the Bush government for fully mistaken."

The "unrestrained energy policy" of the Bush government? Unfortunately Mr. Bergmann never explains what he means by "unrestrained energy policy" nor does he offer viewers a single, specific policy example. Mr. Bergmann has probably never even heard of the last major energy bill signed by President Bush in August 2005. At the signing ceremony for the "Energy Policy Act" Bush had this to say:

"First, the bill makes an unprecedented commitment to energy conservation and efficiency -- an unprecedented commitment.  The bill sets higher efficiency standards for federal buildings and for household products.  It directs the Department of Transportation to study the potential for sensible improvements in fuel-efficiency standards for cars and trucks and SUVs.  It authorizes new funding for research into cutting-edge technologies that will help us do more with less energy.

The bill recognizes that America is the world's leader in technology, and that we've got to use technology to be the world's leader in energy conservation. The bill includes incentives for consumers to be better conservers of energy.  If you own a home, you can receive new tax credits to install energy-efficient windows and appliances.  If you're in the market for a car, this bill will help you save up to $3,500 on a fuel-efficient hybrid or clean-diesel vehicle. And the way the tax credit works is that the more efficient the vehicle is, the more money you will save.  Energy conservation is more than a private virtue; it's a public virtue.  And with this bill I sign today, America is taking the side of consumers who make the choice to conserve."

But hey, real facts and policies don't matter when German journalists report on the USA...perceptions do: Bush lied and people died. Americans are energy-wasting barbarians who reject the eternal virtues of social democracy. At the end of the report, Bergmann concludes:

"Now Americans are paying the piper for their decades of failure in energy policy."

Right on, those short-sighted Americans had it coming! And naturally there is absolutely no mention of the dire poverty of the Venezuelan people. Moderator Peter Mezger states that Venezuela and Chavez can "easily afford" the program because of high oil prices. After all, they are living in a haven of socialist contentment. So who are we to criticize? Who cares if over half the people live in poverty and a quarter live in extreme poverty. At least they don't have "amerikanische Verhaeltnisse," that oft abused German code-word for all that is supposedly wrong with America's social fabric. And that's all that really matters to the useful media idiots at ARD's "Weltspiegel."

Readers can contact the staff of "Weltspiegel" at: weltspiegel@br-online.de

Endnote: The same "Weltspiegel" program (from January 22) contained another brilliant report designed to shatter widely held stereotypes in Germany. Its focus? Bands of thieves in Poland. (Hattip: Michael K.)

UPDATE: In other news, at least nine people have already frozen to death in Germany this winter. In Hamburg alone, two homeless men have frozen to death. (Hattip kcom)

The Secrets of the American Success Story

Of course, President Bush isn't a dolt - but other than that, I have to agree with much of what Anatole Kaletsky writes in this Times article. He addresses a number of reasons for America's greatness - almost all of which are a mystery for the German media.

The President is a dolt - so how can America be such a success story?

(...) For the past five years, America has been led by a president who is clearly not up to the job — a man who is not just inarticulate, but lacking in judgment, intelligence, integrity, charisma or staying power. Yet America as a nation seems to be stronger, more prosperous and self-confident than ever. (...)

Why does America’s prosperity and self-confidence seem to bear so little relationship to the competence of its government? The obvious answer is that America, founded on a libertarian theory of minimal government, has always had low expectations of politicians. In America, it is not just business that thrives independently of government, perhaps even in spite of government. The same is also true of other areas of excellence which in Britain are considered quintessentially in the public domain — higher education, leading-edge science, culture and academic research. Because Americans expect so little of their government, they are rarely disappointed. They do not slump into German-style angst when their governments fail to find solutions to the nation’s problems.

This anarchic spirit was summed up by Ronald Reagan: “The ten most dangerous words in the English language are ‘I’m from the government and I’m here to help you’.” In Europe, by contrast, the public expect government to solve all problems, and the media try to hold politicians accountable for everything. The result is a culture of dependency that extends far beyond the welfare state, to business and to the worlds of education, medicine, arts and science.

The American approach has a powerful advantage rooted in human nature: private sector activity is powered by economic incentives, while the State must operate by rules and sanctions. Since incentives, as Adam Smith observed, are much more likely to stimulate creativity and effort than sanctions, private

Continue reading "The Secrets of the American Success Story" »

Just for the Record: Unemployment in Europe and the U.S.

Comparing economic indicators across borders can be difficult at times. Different definitions can hamper the analysis.

So, these OECD standardised unemployment statistics provide a welcomed realistic assessment of the economic situation in Europe vs. the U.S.:

In the Euro area, the standardised unemployment rate remained at 8.3% in November 2005, 0.5 percentage point lower than a year earlier. The United States’ standardised unemployment rate for December 2005 fell to 4.9%, 0.1 percentage point lower than the previous month and 0.5 percentage point lower than a year earlier. For Japan, the rate was 4.6% in November 2005, 0.1 percentage point higher than the previous month and 0.1 percentage point higher than in November 2004.

In November 2005, the standardised unemployment rate in France fell to 9.2%, 0.1 percentage point lower than the previous month and 0.3 percentage point lower than a year earlier. In Germany, the rate was 9.3% in November 2005, 0.2 percentage point higher than the previous month but 0.2 percentage point lower than in November 2004. In Canada, the standardised unemployment rate was 6.5% in December 2005, 0.1 percentage point higher than the previous month but 0.5 percentage point lower than a year earlier. In September 2005, the rate in the United Kingdom rose to 4.8%, 0.2 percentage point higher than the previous month and 0.2 percentage point higher than a year earlier. In September 2005, the standardised unemployment rate in Italy remained at 7.5%, 0.4 percentage point lower than a year earlier. (emphasis added)

These statistics might prove useful for those in the German media criticizing President Bush for his positive economic outlook in his "State of the Union" speech.

Just in case facts would be of any importance to the German media when it comes to judging the U.S. and the U.S. government...

Germany Running a Ponzi Game?

Here is a letter to Florian Guessgen (Stern magazine) from Medienkritik's reader Patrick Crawford:

Thanks to Davids Medienkritik and other blogs, we have a window on the
media scene in Germany.  To be pro-America is considered a negative?  We
maintain 70,000 American service men and women in your country so you
can be free enough to proclaim your anti-Americanism.  Without the
American military there, you would be writing in Russian.  But, that
probably would be OK with you.

I can almost understand your and Germany's envy and jealousy.  You live
in a country that is running a ponzi game for an economic system.  You
aren't producing the next generation that is supposed to fund your
retirement and healthcare.  Instead, you'll probably have to depend on
an imported workforce–mainly Muslim.  Unfortunately, It seems to me
that the expression "rearranging the deck chairs on the Titanic" sums
up Germany.

Germany running a ponzi game... Looking at some of the political decisions and developments in the country, I suggest this is an undeserved insult for Mr. Ponzi.

The Success Story of the German Social Model

Germany has never subscribed to the American capitalistic model. Rather, consecutive German governments have publicly stressed the virtues of the German Social Model: humans, not profits, are the cornerstone of a policy of social justice. Former chancellor Gerhard Schroeder (now with Russia Inc.) frequently mentioned the inherent advantages of the German Social Model, as compared to the horrors of "pure capitalism". Remember the attacks of American locusts on German workplaces...

Results are now in from an analysis of statistical data from 2004 regarding the situation of families in Germany, conducted by the Konrad-Adenauer-Foundation. As one could expect, the favorable consequences of the German Social Model clearly show up in the data.

Here is a short summary of the family situation in Germany:

  • There are more couples without children than with children.
  • Within Europe Germany is among the countries with the smallest share of households with children.
  • One third of each age group will not have children. This is a worldwide uniquely low share.
  • People's desire to have children is ever shrinking.
  • Marriage is at a historical low in Germany. Those who are married will have an 38 % chance of separation.
  • 12 percent of newborn's parents don't have the German citizenship. In some larger cities, more than 40 percent of children and youths have a migration background. In 2010 migrants will present a 50 percent share of the under 40 age group in many cities.
  • Germany's population size shrinks and the average age rises. In 2050 every third German will be older than 65, and the share of young people (up to 20 years of age) will decline to 16 percent (now at 21 percent).

So, as you can easily see, things are moving in the right direction under the guidance of the German Social Model. Germany within just a few decades will become a lagely sclerotic society with decreasing reliance on Christian and family values.

Obviously, Americans will look at Germany's future with envy and jealousy. Many will ask: "With such fabulous results, wouldn't it make sense to abandon our capitalistic system and switch to the German Social Model?"

Sure it would! And just to let you know: Germany will be glad to offer you advice from the creme de la creme of our social experts, such as Messrs. Gerhard Schroeder, Franz Muentefering or Edmund Stoiber.

Now, that's a deal too good to pass up...

(Text proofread by Richard Bartholomew)

AGAIN!!! AMERICAN CAPITALIST BLOOD-SUCKERS ATTACK THE GERMAN FATHERLAND!!!

This is so disgusting, so disappointing! Just when we thought the worst attacks from these awful American capitalist parasites were over...

Locustigmetall_1_2

HERE THEY COME AGAIN!!

From Handelsblatt, Germany's largest business daily: the U.S. investor Cerberus has acquired Baubecon, a German real estate company, which manages 50,000 apartments, of which it owns 20,000.

Can you imagine this scandal - the poor tennants of tens of thousands of apartments at the mercy of profit-minded American capitalists? I'm just so glad, we have IG Metall on our side, the largest trade union in the whole world! Remember IG Metall's courageous words against these American parasites: "Blackstone, KKR, Investcorp - finance investors from America are slaughtering German companies. They buy the companies, only to sell them a bit later for profit. The American investors don't show any consideration for people, regions or traditions. Like flies they suck the money out of companies, then swarm out, repeating the same pattern. People are the ones who suffer."

Now, Cerberus (which, according to Hoover's, is named after "a three-headed dog that guards the gates of hell") definitely fits into the company of "Blackstone, KKR, Investcorp"! No further proof needed here...

So, IG Metall - load the cannons! First, let's attack the treacherous German seller of Baubecon: BGAG.

BTW - who's BGAG? Ah well, let's not get into so many details... it's late anyway. I mean, why would you want to know that?

OK, you asked for it. The owners of BGAG, who sold out tens of thousands of low income tennants to American blood-sucking capitalists, are...

The German unions. (Sorry.)

Let me repeat this:

THE GERMAN UNIONS DGB, IG METALL AND VER.DI SOLD OUT TENS OF THOUSANDS OF LOW INCOME TENNANTS TO A TYPE OF BUYER THEY ONLY RECENTLY CALLED BLOOD-SUCKERS!

Of course, the supervisory board of Baubecon is full of trade union bosses...

You think you've seen it all? Well, it gets even worse. Or more hilarious, depending on your point of view.

Guess who is chairman of Cerberus? The chairman of Cerberus is...

Continue reading "AGAIN!!! AMERICAN CAPITALIST BLOOD-SUCKERS ATTACK THE GERMAN FATHERLAND!!!" »

The Hu Jintao Visit and the German Left's Deafening Silence

(By Ray Drake)

This week Chinese President Hu Jintao is taking several days to visit Germany. And while Germany's Eurosnob elite wines and dines President Hu, there will be no angry mass protests or cries of indignation on German streets. There will be no rainbow flags embroidered with "PACE" accompanied by Tibetan and Taiwanese flags. There will be no peace drums, silent vigils or burning of Hu Jintao effigies. There will be no courageous speeches on morality or human rights in front of thousands of drunk and screaming marchers. There will be few if any indignant editorials condemning President Hu in leading German papers, magazines or news broadcasts. 

The image “http://www.tagesschau.de/styles/container/image/style_images_default/0,1307,OID4941810,00.jpg” cannot be displayed, because it contains errors.

German President Koehler with Hu Jintao: Never Fear Dear Leader, Germans Only Protest American Human Rights Violations!

And, other than a few token comments from President Koehler on democracy and human rights, the only sound to be heard will be the deafening, silent hypocrisy of the so-called German "peace" movement accompanied by an unabated cacophony of cash registers ringing in the background as German business moguls sign multi-million Euro deals and tip champagne glasses with their beloved Chinese counterparts.

And, with any luck, President Hu will be able to convince Germany's new leaders that soon-to-be-ex-Chancellor Gerhard Schroeder was right all along in his support of lifting the EU's arms embargo on China. After all, what could be more conducive to "peace" than selling Communist dictators with violent designs on island neighbors tons of high-tech European weapons? And who in Germany's "peace" movement really cares about the record-setting mass executions, imprisonment of political dissidents or occupation of Tibet? None of that matters enough to get a serious demonstration together...yawn.

To conclude, none of this should really surprise anyone. Vladimir Putin's last visit to Germany went just as smoothly. Hardly anyone felt it necessary to bring up the war in Chechnya and the massive human rights abuses that have accompanied it just as hardly anyone felt it necessary to bring up the rapid decline of civil liberties in Russia in recent years. Just par for the course as they say...

Note: Siemens has already signed a deal during the visit for 60 ICE-trains worth an estimated 700 million Euros. Now that is some serious dealing. Cha-Ching!

Why conservatism is verboten in Germany

This is an interesting analysis of the German landscape. While I wished the author had mentioned the Free Democrats as at least a moderate pro-business party, I have to agree with most of his conclusions. Germany is in trouble for lack of a true conservative party with pro-market instincts.

Why conservatism is verboten in Germany    
By : Eric Culp October 30, 2005 

DURING the recent German election campaign, a number of us German-based journalists called the Christian Democrats (CDU) and their Bavarian brethren the Christian Social Union (CSU) “conservatives”. We could not have been more wrong.

The CDU-CSU may be to the right of the Social Democrats and the Greens, but they are not conservatives. There is no political element in Germany that one can call right-wing conservative in the Anglo-US sense. And as long as Germany fails to spawn a party that has the guts to say people

Continue reading "Why conservatism is verboten in Germany" »

The Superiority of the German Social Model

The German social model is indefinitely superior to the capitalist U.S. model, which time and again was convincingly proven by Gerhard Schroeder and his ilk.

For example, just look at the dynamics of Social Security benefits:

Benefits from Social Security to go up 4.1%

Oops - in the U.S., that is:

October 15, 2005

ASSOCIATED PRESS

WASHINGTON -- More than 48 million Americans who receive Social Security benefits will get a 4.1% increase in their monthly checks next year, the largest increase in more than a decade, the Social Security Administration announced Friday.

The average Social Security benefit recipient will see his or her monthly check increase from $963 to $1,002 starting in January.

The average retired couple both receiving Social Security benefits will see their monthly check go from $1,583 to $1,648.

What - a meager monthly $1,002 for the average Social Security benefit recipient? A paltry $1,648 for the average retired couple both receiving Social Security benefits?

So, here comes the proud average German worker Social Security recipient with a whopping monthly 598 Euro (approx. $720) in 2004 (in the states of former West Germany). For former employees, the average monthly rent is 812 Euro (approx. $980). Depending on how you combine the two amounts, the average monthly Social Security benefit in Germany is somewhere between 700 and 750 Euro ($840 and $900) (Source).

Now, I didn't bother to check the Social Security benefits for the average retired German couple both receiving Social Security benefits. I bet the ranch on a lower average, compared to U.S. data.

And then there are the "Nullrunden" - a difficult to translate German Social Security speciality that secures zero or negative income growth for retired folks in Germany. Average Social Security benefits in Germany actually dropped in the last 2 years, and the likelihood of positive growth in the year ahead is virtually nil.

Hmm... Gerhard, we have a question!

Gerhard?

(Hat tip Steve)

Kannapolis Translation: SPIEGEL ONLINE Crumbles Under Massive Pressure

Last week we reported on an extensive, four-part SPIEGEL article on unemployment in the United States that was featured on the publication's homepage and in its magazine. A few days later we called on SPIEGEL ONLINE to present the piece on its "English Site" to give readers a better view of its reporting on the United States.

Just to provide new readers some background: The entire SPIEGEL article revolves around the city of Kannapolis, North Carolina and an unemployed family there. It is an individual story of misery that the magazine presents as representative of unemployment in the USA.

Anyway, in the meantime we did some research, and with some help from our readers found that the current unemployment rate in the North Carolina county where Kannapolis is located is below 5% (and also below the national average) and has fallen significantly in the past two years. Compared to the German unemployment rate, which has been well over 10% for quite some time now, the track record in Kannapolis is downright impressive.

The image “http://www.beimami.com/wp-images/unemp.jpg” cannot be displayed, because it contains errors.

Unemployment Comparison: Kannapolis is in Carrabus County, North Carolina (source)

You could say the area around Kannapolis is a model for combatting unemployment. But that isn't how things are presented in SPIEGEL. The city is described as a hopeless cesspool of American societal decay. And this clear bias is what initially prompted us to report on the original German piece and call for an English translation.

Davids Medienkritik Gets Results

And make no mistake: Davids Medienkritik makes an impact. When we write, German media sit-up, listen and take notes. A couple of days after we posted a piece demanding an English version, SPON caved under the pressure and published a translation. It is entitled, "For Residents of Kannapolis, Unemployment is as American as Apple Pie."

Readers should have a look at as much of the piece as they can stomach, keeping in mind how much lower unemployment in Kannapolis is than all of Germany. Readers should also keep in mind that the English version is not nearly as harsh as the German version and that SPIEGEL is notorious for spinning its translations differently for English readers. Take the example below:

Another Crooked Translation from SPIEGEL ONLINE

Same caption, different text: Even SPIEGEL ONLINE's photo captions exhibit the sort of crooked translation that we have come to expect from them. The German on the left states: "Worked crooked for the firm: After 35 years at Pinnotex, Marshall Pinnix was one of 5000 let go." Why doesn't the English version contain the grim reference to being "worked crooked"? Why is that omitted? Is the translator trying to soften the blow for English-speaking readers? Why don't they just write what they mean?

Anyway, if you have comments on the Kannapolis piece, send them to SPIEGEL ONLINE's "English Site" people at: daryl_lindsey@spiegel.de, charles_hawley@spiegel.de, jody_biehl@spiegel.de

Update: Read this outstanding posting at the Transatlantic Intelligencer.

SPIEGEL ONLINE on Unemployment: Kannapolis Instead of Chemnitz

(By Ray Drake)

Today's Germany is plagued by record-level, double-digit unemployment. Once an economic juggernaut and model, the nation has seen growth slow to a virtual halt. Once a paragon of fiscal responsibility, the nation's national debt has risen to record levels in repeated violation of EU standards. For the past several years, business after business has gone belly up. In wide segments of eastern Germany, unemployment hovers between 15 and 20% and a permanent underclass has formed that is increasingly marked by hopelessness and extremist tendencies. The bloated social welfare state and the convoluted tax code are both in urgent need of reform, yet the nation's leaders seem unwilling or unable to make those reforms in a timely manner.

You'd think that with so many domestic, economic problems, the German media would have plenty to report on. But get this: Germany's influential SPIEGEL ONLINE is currently running an enormous, four-part article on unemployment...in the United States!

And not only that, the article is featured as an exclusive piece at the very top of SPIEGEL ONLINE's homepage and has been prominently displayed for days now:

A Familiar Theme: "Amerikanische Verhältnisse"

The article focuses on the misery of unemployment in the North Carolina town of Kannapolis, which, according to the piece, was hard-hit by the closure of a major textile mill. We aren't going to analyze every line of this sixty-plus paragraph whopper, but the introduction pretty much sums up its tone and message:

"Unemployed in America: The Subjects of Kannapolis
By Alexander Osang

"Amerikanische Verhältnisse" is something like a scary ghost in the debate on the social system. The example of workers from a textile mill in North Carolina tells how it is to be an unemployed American.

Randall Keller has a lot of things on his mind that he could tell about, but not much of it would be appropriate for a wedding speech. His father is dying, his son is in the war and the factory that he worked for his entire life is being torn down. He hasn't bought himself a shirt for two years. Nobody would want to hear that at a wedding, not even at this one."

Truly depressing. It may well be that some of America's unemployed indeed face such a dire plight. But is Mr. Keller's story truly representative of America's unemployed? Is this an accurate representation of "Amerikanische Verhältnisse"? Or has the author chosen Mr. Keller and the town of Kannapolis as a conduit through which to reinforce political viewpoints and stereotypes popular with SPIEGEL ONLINE readers? Upon further examination of the piece it would seem that the latter is true. Take, for example, the following passages:

"The state only really plays a role in the social life of an American when he is old or crazy or ill - or a catastrophe happens, as it did a couple weeks ago in New Orleans. The state is something like the "cleaner". It comes at the last possible moment of urgent need and patches things up. Even the American social system itself was founded by President Franklin D. Roosevelt after a crisis, the Great Depression. Other Presidents changed a few things here and there, mainly Reagan and Clinton, but it has really always kept its makeshift character. He who loses his job can receive unemployment money for 26 weeks, around nine million people are currently without a job.

Unemployment money varies depending on the state, it can be up to a maximum of half of the final salary and is paid out of the respective unemployment fund of each state. After 26 weeks there is nothing more. If things are really bad, like in Kannapolis, the phase in which there is unemployment money can be doubled and the states can borrow money from Washington. (...) In such a crisis even a land like America reaches for the tools of social democracy."

As a resident of the state of Maryland, in which the state covers health insurance costs for children who otherwise lack coverage, it is clear to me that Mr. Osang's assessment represents a massive oversimplification and is far from accurate. Yet his article is likely taken as gospel by far too many of its German readers. And of course, Osang cannot avoid the mandatory reference to the ultimate symbol of American societal decay:

"The "Jerry Springer Show" is playing on television. Two unbelievably fat black girls are fighting over a small, grinning boy. The audience is screaming. One of the girls pulls up her t-shirt and lets her breasts fall."

The Jerry Springer reference is extremely tiresome. So are the references to unions, Michael Moore and the Iraq war sprinkled throughout. Why? Because these references have reached a sort of critical mass in Germany. For years now they have been approached from the same angle time after time after time. They have become so worn-out and hackneyed that it seems a waste of time to even discuss them. What we should discuss is why they recur so often in German media...

Comfort: It's Still So Much Worse Over There...Really...It Is...Oh Yeah...

So here is the fundamental question: Why would a major German magazine prominently feature an article on American unemployment on its homepage at a time like this?

Clearly, there is a desire and need to provide readers with a sort of psychological massage. In other words, this article gives them the impression that while things in Germany may be quite bad, at least the situation is still much worse in the United States. Put another way, SPIEGEL ONLINE is providing emotional comfort and satisfaction in the perception that, as bad as things might be in Germany, the system (i.e. the German social-welfare state) is still superior to that of the Americans, a group whose more neo-liberal, laissez-faire approach to the world deeply threatens the left-leaning worldview of SPON readers. And this false sense of comfort is effectively delivered by articles like the one on Kannapolis that inaccurately present America as an uncaring, desolate social wasteland. Not surprisingly, it is far more emotionally satisfying to read about the perceived misery of others with an attitude of pseudo-superiority than it is to confront the misery of one's own nation.

Journalism the SPIEGEL Way: Stereotypes and Ideology Replace Reality

The photo that accompanies the Osang article really says it all. It fully embodies the long-held stereotypes many Germans hold of America as a land devoid of any sense of social charity and solidarity. The United States is presented as a land that leaves bent-over old men who have worked their entire lives to fend for themselves in an uncaring, Darwinian society.

And despite its length, Osang's work makes no real attempt to explain the true nature and complexity of the role played by the state in American society. It makes no real attempt to explain the multi-faceted, cross-jurisdictional aspects of social welfare systems on local, state and federal levels nor does it explore how they interact to provide services to citizens. It makes but a feeble attempt to describe the wide variations in benefits from state to state, only briefly glossing-over differences in unemployment benefits. It also largely fails to discuss the enormous role that private charities, institutions and organizations play in providing social services in America and how they cooperate with the state to provide programs, services and benefits. Instead, the article remains stuck in the anecdotal and focuses largely on a small, selective sliver of personal misery in one community with few real connections to the larger picture. And, unfortunately, that small sliver of misery is all SPIEGEL ONLINE really wants to show its readers.

Furthermore, Osang makes no mention of the fact that, despite 9-11, two wars, two hurricanes and rapidly rising oil prices, the US economy has maintained dynamic economic growth rates and has an unemployment level that is around half of the German unemployment rate in terms of percentages. The United States also has a lower percentage of long-term unemployed and continues to attract and provide jobs for millions of both legal and illegal immigrants. One has to ask: If America is really such a miserable place, how come so many people, including quite a few Germans, want to give up everything to move there?

Kannapolis Instead of Chemnitz

So let's not kid ourselves: Once again, SPIEGEL ONLINE has chosen the easy way out. Instead of running a large, four-part documentary on unemployment in a German city like Chemnitz, the magazine is running an emotionally-pleasing collection of stereotypes on Kannapolis, North Carolina. After all, why upset German readers with the reality that surrounds them when it is so much more enjoyable to wallow in the perceived misery of others...?

UPDATE: The unemployment rate in Cabarrus County, North Carolina (in which Kannapolis is located), is currently less than 5% and has dropped dramatically over the past two years. Today's Germany can only dream about unemployment levels that low. Looks like the people in Kannapolis are doing a little bit better than Mr. Osang and the cronies at SPIEGEL ONLINE would have us believe...

Update #2: This outstanding comment was left by one of our readers:

"One would like to believe that the German public is also beginning to find such articles "extremely tiresome." I do not, however, have the impression that this is the case. On the contrary, as the anti-American propaganda gets shriller and more outrageous the German public seems to clamour for even more of it.

This is not just a German phenomenon of course. Even a cursory look at a site like “Watching America” reveals the worldwide nature of the problem. These sorts of gratuitous attacks on America are global, relentless and, unfortunately, quite effective. That this nonsense has been so successful in Germany is, however, exceptionally disappointing. I grew up believing that Germany and America had built a special relationship after WWII, an impression that seemed to be confirmed when I first arrived in Germany in the mid-eighties. That this relationship could be so quickly and severely damaged by propaganda perpetrated by the German media and actively encouraged by the current German government has been a deep disappointment to me. I have little doubt that anti-Americanism played a significant role in the poor performance of the CDU in the latest German election – not that they didn’t try their best to lose outright.

Now I know that some people might counter that it is the actions of the current American administration that has led to the problem. Well, I have been living here for twenty years, and I can’t for the life of me figure out what any American administration has done during that time that should so anger the Germans. But I do know what I read, see and hear in the German news every day, and it is ugly, ugly, ugly.

It should be obvious to anyone with a lick of intelligence that it makes little sense for a German publication to run stories on the unemployed in some obscure American town when worse conditions exist in almost every German municipality, unless of course, the story actually has nothing to do with unemployment, but rather with demonizing one’s enemies. SPIEGEL doesn’t have a reason to do a story on unemployment in Chemitz, because Chemitz is not the enemy."

Note: "Amerikanische Verhältnisse" is a German term that means: conditions as in America. (Hattip Dan Kauffman, beimami)

Our Mission

The Debate

Radical Islam

Support Medienkritik

Awards

  • The 2006 Weblog Awards

Recent Comments

August 2008

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
          1 2
3 4 5 6 7 8 9
10 11 12 13 14 15 16
17 18 19 20 21 22 23
24 25 26 27 28 29 30
31