How Unhoeflich from Gates!

CNN:
U.S. Defense Secretary Robert Gates plans to press European allies to contribute more to the fight in Afghanistan during two days of informal NATO meetings that began Thursday in the Lithuanian capital. (...)

Gates has made no secret of his frustration with allies reluctant to send more troops and equipment to Afghanistan. Testifying at the Senate Wednesday, before his trip to the meeting in Vilnius, Gates warned that the issue threatens to break the nearly 60-year-old alliance apart. "I worry a great deal about the alliance evolving into a two-tiered alliance in which you have some allies willing to fight and die to protect people's security and others who are not," Gates said. (...)

"The Americans are becoming increasingly frustrated with the inability of the European allies to get their act together," said Michael Williams, an analyst with the Royal United Services Institute, a military think tank. "Not just in terms of burden-sharing, which allies are doing in the north, but risk-sharing."

Gates in his closing statement to the Senate Armed Services Committee:

In visits to the combat theaters, in military hospitals, and in bases and posts at home and around the world, I continue to be amazed by their decency, resiliency, and courage. Through the support of the Congress and our nation, these young men and women will prevail in the current conflicts and be prepared to confront the threats that they, their children, and our nation may face in the future.

I just wonder if any German politician or journalist would find it appropriate to thank the U.S. troops - or British, Canadian or Dutch troops - for their "decency, resiliency, and courage" displayed during fights in the southern parts of Afghanistan, where, due to a national obsession with military defeat, German troops have not been noticed as yet.   

On the other hand, given Germany's less than stellar record in training the police in Afghanistan, hopes for a significant improvement in the south of Afghanistan through the deploament of German troops may prove elusive:

Germany is coming under severe criticism for failing to train an effective Afghan police force to provide security for the local population and help NATO against Taliban insurgents in the south, according to military officials and defense experts. (...)

Germany's record in training the Afghan police has come under particular scrutiny as NATO and the EU try to coordinate the military, civilian and development efforts to prevent the south from falling into the hands of warlords and drug cartels.

NATO's top military commander, General James Jones, has repeatedly criticized Germany's role in training the Afghan police and the police's inability to protect civilians. "The training has been very disappointing," Jones said in a recent interview. (source)

Surprise: HRW Criticizes Germany for Cowardly Afghanistan Policy

Hard to believe but true: even Human Rights Watch criticizes Germany for its cowardly Afghanistan policy.

As reported in DMK, Germany does not accept a fair share of NATO's military burden in Afghanistan. Now Kenneth Roth, HRW's executive director, harshly critizes Germany's refusal to send troops to the southern parts of the country, where fighting with the Taliban is very intense. In an interview with German news agency ddp, Roth accuses Germany of providing troops only for the safest regions in Afghanistan.

But...but...we lost WW2!! Germans are still in a state of shock!! Our troops are mentally incapable of brute force!! (Which, btw, puts Germany on the moral ground as compared to that cowboy run capitalist, fascist, christian-fundamentalist state, ifyouknowwhoimean...)

Any diplomatic jobs available instead? Or, maybe, some interesting business opportunities for German companies?

Germany's Role in Afghanistan: Commitment to Fight Terrorism Verbally

The U.S. and Canada question - gasp! - Germany's willingness to share the burden of NATO's Afghanistan mission:

AP: Report: Gates letter urges Germany to increase troops to Afghanistan / January 31, 2008
U.S. Secretary of Defense Robert Gates has written to his German counterpart urging Berlin to send an additional 3,200 troops to Afghanistan, warning that the NATO-led force there could lose credibility without reinforcement, a Defense Ministry spokesman confirmed Thursday. (...) Gates specifically asks Germany to drop caveats limiting its troops to the north of Afghanistan and to send helicopter units, infantry and paratroopers that could join the fight against Taliban militants in the south... While all 26 NATO allies have units in Afghanistan, France, Turkey and Italy, as well as Germany, refuse to send significant numbers to the southern combat zone.

WSJ: NATO's Afghan Failure / February 1, 2008
(...) Maybe France, Germany and other so-called NATO allies (...) heed the Canadian Prime Minister's call to share the war-fighting burden in Afghanistan.
Miracles happen. For the time being, however, the Continentals are in no apparent hurry to break a five-decade habit of enjoying a free ride on security. None seriously answered NATO's call for up to 7,000 more troops for Afghanistan. So the U.S. last month announced a "temporary" deployment of another 3,200 Marines, the second large reinforcement in a year. That brings the U.S. deployment to nearly 30,000, with about half those troops as part of the NATO force of 42,000.
The plight of the Canadians ought to shame other allies. Mr. Harper warned that his country wouldn't extend its 2,500-strong mission in Afghanistan's unstable southern provinces unless Europe ponies up troops and equipment. (...) Though the mission flies a NATO flag, Germany, Italy and Spain put caveats on their troops, preventing them from leaving more peaceful areas to reinforce the Canadians and others in the south and east.(...)
The Continentals fill up lots of air space at policy conferences talking about Europe's readiness to play a prominent role in global affairs. The Canadians are now usefully calling their bluff.

This just in: Germany categorically refuses to send troops to Afghanistan`s south.

Our American and Canadians friends can be rest assured that Germany will unswervingly stick to its commitment to verbally fight terrorism with all possible means, weekdays from 9 to 5.

Update: Times Online: Frosty German reply to US call for help in Afghanistan

Comment from Ray: Germany should not complain that others do not see the nation as a first-rate power or take it seriously after this shameful episode.

First Germany criticizes the United States for being too unilateral in the fight against terror - then when the United States calls for more support from its German ally - it is decisively rejected. This may prompt Canada to abandon the fight - reinforcing views in the USA that many of the NATO allies are not entirely reliable or worth consulting when the going gets tough.

German Politician Peter Gauweiler: USA Cannot Exterminate Cultures "as with Apaches and Sioux"

(By Ray D.)

Atlantic Review, Apocalypso and Achse des Guten point to a case of particularly vile anti-American commentary from a prominent German politician. This time the culprit is CSU (Bavarian Christian-Social-Union) politician and conservative parliamentarian Dr. Peter Gauweiler, a member of the Bundestag committee on foreign relations and Chairman of the subcommittee on foreign cultural and educational policy. In an interview with Deutschlandfunk (German radio), Gauweiler made these remarks on Afghanistan (translated from German by DMK):

"The military involvement in Afghanistan is on another, much better mandate in terms of international law than the American's war in Iraq, which violates international law, that is beyond dispute. Nevertheless, one would have to be blind and deaf not to recognize that in Afghanistan we are factually steering towards an Iraqification of the war. For that, the Bundestag has provided no mandate and for that our Grundgesetz (Constitution) correctly gives us no possibility to participate. Ms. Merkel must make clear in America on this concrete case, that it is without question, for example, that the Bundeswehr and we will not support the confusion and catastrophic conditions that the United States has helped to create and is in part responsible for in southern Afghanistan by making Tornado-aircraft available. We must make it clear to the Americans, or to be more precise the current American government, that they cannot exterminate other cultural aspirations on this planet - and it is not automatically terrorism - as they did with the Apaches and Sioux."

Here's the bottom line: Dr. Gauweiler is justifying Germany's unwillingness to share the burden in Afghanistan by stoking ugly, primitive anti-American stereotypes and hiding behind Germany's Constitution. In fact, it is not the United States - but the fanatical ideology that is Radical Islam - that is attempting to "exterminate the cultural aspirations on this planet."

Dr. Peter Gauweiler (CSU): Chair of the Bundestag subcommittee on foreign cultural and educational policy: "We must make it clear to the Americans, or to be more precise the current American government, that they cannot exterminate other cultural aspirations on this planet (...) as they did with the Apaches and Sioux."

If anyone is deaf and blind about the threats facing Germany and the West, than it is truly Dr. Gauweiler, who apparently feels more threatened by Guantanamo (which President Bush himself said he wanted to shut down while in Germany) and McDonalds than the prospect of mass terror, suicide bombings, Sharia law and total subordination to Islamic order. It is the Taliban, not the Western forces in Afghanistan and not the United States, that is clearly responsible for what Dr. Gauweiler describes as the violent "Iraqification" of the nation's south. (And that is not even a good analogy because Iraq primarily suffers sectarian violence at this point.)

The blame-America-first-neurosis from which Gauweiler and others like him openly suffer worldwide was best diagnosed by Tony Blair, who recently wrote:

"Moreover, the struggles in Iraq and Afghanistan are plainly not about those countries' liberation from U.S. occupation. The extremists' goal is to prevent those countries from becoming democracies -- not "Western-style" democracies but any sort of democracy. It is the extremists, not us, who are slaughtering the innocent and doing it deliberately. They are the only reason for the continuing presence of our troops in Iraq and Afghanistan. (...)

Yet despite all of this, which I consider fairly obvious, many in Western countries listen to the propaganda of the extremists and accept it. (And to give credit where it is due, the extremists play our own media with a shrewdness that would be the envy of many a political party.) They look at the bloodshed in Iraq and say it is a reason for leaving. Every act of carnage somehow serves to indicate our responsibility for the disorder rather than the wickedness of those who caused it. Many believe that what was done in Iraq in 2003 was so wrong that they are reluctant to accept what is plainly right now. (...)

This ideology has to be taken on -- and taken on everywhere. Islamist terrorism will not be defeated until we confront not just the methods of the extremists but also their ideas. I do not mean just telling them that terrorist activity is wrong. I mean telling them that their attitude toward the United States is absurd, that their concept of governance is prefeudal, that their positions on women and other faiths are reactionary. We must reject not just their barbaric acts but also their false sense of grievance against the West, their attempt to persuade us that it is others and not they themselves who are responsible for their violence.

In the era of globalization, the outcome of this clash between extremism and progress will determine our future. We can no more opt out of this struggle than we can opt out of the climate changing around us. Inaction -- pushing the responsibility onto the United States alone or deluding ourselves that this terrorism is a series of individual isolated incidents rather than a global movement -- would be profoundly and fundamentally wrong."

On another note, Dr. Gauweiler might want to stop and reflect that Bavaria and its people have benefited enormously from the historic accident of having been occupied by the United States after World War II. One of the reasons Mr. Gauweiler has the freedom to vilify the United States on public radio is because the United States fought and sacrificed hundreds-of-thousands of its sons and daughters to rid Germany of Nazism and fought for German unification after standing guard for decades along the Iron Curtain. We know that some Germans are getting tired of "feeling so thankful" about that, but too damn bad, we are going to remind you again.

Bavaria and the Taliban: Would they still be pouring beer at Oktoberfest?

Further, most people in Bavaria would probably agree that in the six-plus-decades of American military presence, that Bavarian culture is still going strong, as evidenced by the CSU's iron-death-grip on power in that state. After all, when was the last time you saw an American holding a gun to a Bavarian's head as he or she was walking into a McDonalds, KFC, Burger King or Pizza Hut? And let us ask this: How would Bavaria have fared had it been occupied for several decades by the Taliban or Al-Qaeda? Would Dr. Gauweiler and his family have slept peacefully at night and worshipped and voted peacefully by day? Would they still be pouring beer at Oktoberfest? The obvious answers to those questions reveal the true threat to "cultural aspirations" in the world today. It is radical Islam - not the United States - that fundamentally theatens our culture and all culture.

Those who truly value the transatlantic partnership must never allow the security versus civil liberties debate taking place in most Western societies to obscure the larger struggle against a fanatical Islamic worldview that would not hesitate to exterminate our societies and way of life if given the opportunity. And while the transatlantic societies may have substantial differences over how best to deal with the threat, they all have a common interest in confronting and defeating that worldview in Afghanistan, Iraq and around the world. Hiding behind legalisms and resentments, as Dr. Gauweiler choses to do, simply divides and weakens us all.

Gauweiler's comments, along with those of Werner Hoyer (FDP), demonstrate that hostility towards the United States stretches across the political spectrum in Germany. The SPD, Greens and PDS have traditionally been the driving force behind anti-American sentiment in the political sphere, but they by no means have a monopoly on this unfortunate form of blame-America-first populism. One has to wonder when, if ever, the World-Scapegoat-USA mentality will ever be vigorously confronted and discredited.

Finally, Atlantic Review gives Gauweiler credit for making some positive statements about the "American dream." We won't. Those statements are little more than lip service and a thin veil to mask Dr. Gauweiler's arrogant disdain for the United States. Anyone who implies that the United States is out to exterminate other cultures, while the Taliban and other Islamic fanatics are running around the planet beheading, bombing and bestializing their enemies, obviously has a very serious screw loose and needs to be confronted with his own ignorance.

Contact Dr. Gauweiler: peter.gauweiler@bundestag.de
If you would like to write in English, we strongly suggest you contact Ulf Gartzke, the director of the CSU's representative "Hanns Seidel Foundation" in Washington: gartzke@hsfusa.org
Conact the CSU in Germany: info@csu-bayern.de
We insist you to keep your comments civil, polite and respectful.

(Emphasis ours throughout)

Endnote: When it comes to throwing stones over the historical extermination of other cultures, Dr. Gauweiler ought to consider for a moment that he himself is sitting in a highly brittle glass house.

Germany to Nato Allies: Don't Call Us, We'll Call You

Germany is somewhat less than enthusiastic about an equal share of the burden in Afghanistan:

KANDAHAR, Afghanistan — The NATO-led force in Afghanistan would be more effective if member countries lifted restrictions that prevent their troops from fighting insurgents in the country's restive south, a senior Canadian military officer said today.

Many of the 37 troop-contributing countries serving with the 31,000-member force have refused to join the fight against Taliban and other insurgents in the south, leaving the task to Canadian, American, British and Dutch soldiers.

The French, German and Italian forces patrol relatively quiet sectors in the north under self-imposed limitations, known in NATO as "caveats," that keep them out of combat operations.

Brig.-Gen. Tim Grant, in charge of the 2,500 Canadian troops in Afghanistan, said that if the commander of the NATO-led force "had more flexibility in the deployment and the use of all the troops here, I think it would be better for everyone."

"The issue is not necessarily having more troops stationed here on a permanent basis," Grant told The Associated Press in an interview at the sprawling military base at Kandahar Airfield.

"But if there are situations ... when it is important to have different capacities, different capabilities on the ground, that is when (the NATO) commander needs to be able to move troops."

Speaking Friday in Quebec City, NATO Secretary General Jaap de Hoop Scheffer also urged legislators from the alliance's member countries to lean on their governments to remove troop restrictions. He said national caveats are understandable, but ultimately divisive.

At least 289 members of the U.S. military have died in Afghanistan, Pakistan and Uzbekistan as a result of the U.S. invasion in late 2001 to oust the Taliban regime for hosting Osama bin Laden.

At least 42 Canadians have been killed in the war, including 34 soldiers this year alone. Britain has lost at least 40 soldiers, while the Netherlands has had four deaths. (Source)

Well, dear NATO friends, Germany has an important role to play at the sidelines. German politicians prefer the referee job, you know.

As to others doing the hard work, have a safe trip home!

Our Mission

The Debate

Radical Islam

Support Medienkritik

Awards

  • The 2006 Weblog Awards

Recent Comments

May 2008

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
        1 2 3
4 5 6 7 8 9 10
11 12 13 14 15 16 17
18 19 20 21 22 23 24
25 26 27 28 29 30 31

Categories

Stats

Recommended Reading

Search