A Minor Torture Incident

Not that you should care...it's really nothing of any importance...don't even know whether it happened at all. AND IF SO, WHAT WOULD IT PROVE?

Anyway, since you're asking, here's the story (again, no big deal, really):

EU Soldiers Accused of Torturing Civilians in Congo
The Swedish military has accused French soldiers of torturing civilians during the EU-led Operation Artemis in the Democratic Republic of Congo in 2003, one of the bloc's first joint missions.
Five years ago, the European Union sent some 1,500 soldiers to DR Congo as part of a UN mission to take action against the bandits marauding the north-eastern part of the country. The troops were there to protect the civilians.
Now the Swedish military is saying that French soldiers tortured Congolese civilians during the operation. The German government, which didn't send troops on the mission but provided logistical assistance, couldn't confirm the accusations.

"The Foreign Ministry is not aware of the report," a ministry spokeswoman told DW-WORLD.DE. "We will examine the issue."

Now - that means a lot, I can tell you. Until the examination is finished (somewhere in the vicinities of the 22nd century), the German media's coverage of the incident will be merciless till truth is found.

Or not.

After all, what's all the fuss about torture? I mean, there was a war going on, and some folks got a bit agitated in the course of it... Perhaps these "civilians" weren't so civil at all?

Don't we have more important things to talk about? Such as this incredible, huge torture scandal in Abu Ghraib which for the upteenth time was presented in last week's edition of German left wing weekly magazine stern. (Hat tip Jane)

Torture: Headlines vs. No Headlines

The latest torture pictures from Iraq get little play in the German media (exception: BILD):


(Source)

Forget about an appearance on the cover of SPIEGEL or STERN.

I guess the gentlemen from Al Qaeda won't be too happy about this lame PR fallout... Well, as an excuse the German media can claim that they didn't report much on torture under Saddam either.

It's not, however, as if the topic of torture wasn't of any interest to the German media. Now, these OUTRAGEOUS TORTURE EXAMPLES definitely made headlines:

Spon105n

For the life of me...I can't come up with an explanation as to why some torture pics make headlines in German media and others don't...

Any ideas??

Update: More Al Qaeda-torture news...

NOTE from Ray on selective headlines: Something to keep in mind over this Memorial Day weekend: While the US and world media are absolutely obsessed with presenting and re-presenting "US casualties" in every imaginable light and form - in what can only be characterized at this point as willful defeatism - there is virtually no acknowledgment that the US military is slowly bleeding Al-Qaeda and other terrorist networks to death - unless a leader so large is killed that they can't ignore it. Why won't they show the massive casualties taken by the insurgents? CNN will show snipers killing US soldiers - but they won't show you this.

As David asks: Any ideas why??

NOTE #2 from Ray: Speaking of selective headlines: It will be interesting to see if our media friends at ARD Weltspiegel, who so gullibly swallowed Hugo Chavez's propaganda oil donations to Joseph Kennedy in Boston, will now dedicate large chunks of air time to explaining why their Socialist hero is stamping out freedom of speech and shutting down opposition media at home. As journalists, you would think that is a story they would jump to report.

Or perhaps author Justin Webb was correct. Writing of the European left, he observed:

"The protests against nuclear weapons, for instance, concentrated on American weapons. The anti-war rallies were against American-led wars. The anti death penalty campaign focused on Texas. A pattern was emerging and has never seriously been altered. A pattern of willingness to condemn America for the tiniest indiscretion - or to magnify those indiscretions - while leaving the murderers, dictators, and thieves who run other nations oddly untouched."

Stay tuned...

Germany's Abu Ghraib?

This could become something very big. Actually, it already is. It's presented as top news by practically all German media:

German soldiers 'posed with skull' in Afghanistan
25/10/2006 - 08:36:42

Germany’s Defence Ministry today said it was investigating photos published by the country’s biggest-selling newspaper that appeared to show German troops in Afghanistan posing with a skull.

The Bild daily said the macabre pictures, one of which it printed on its front page, showed German peacekeepers near the capital, Kabul, in early 2003.

The uniformed men were seen holding up the skull and posing with it on a 4x4 vehicle; one is seen exposing himself with the skull.

Bild’s headline declared: “German soldiers desecrate a dead person.”

The newspaper said it was unclear where the skull came from, or whether it belonged to an Afghan or dated back to the Soviet occupation in the 1980s. It did not say how it obtained the photos.

“We are taking the accusations seriously,” said Defence Ministry spokesman Thomas Raabe said. He added that Defence Minister Franz Josef Jung had ordered they be looked into immediately.

“It is clear and unambiguous that such behaviour on the part of German soldiers absolutely cannot be tolerated ... the pictures arouse repulsion,” Bild quoted Jung as saying.

One of the pictures shows a soldier holding the skull next to his penis. (At this time (October 25, 10 a.m. Berlin time) no pictures available on the BILD online site. Well, we can help out... See Update 1 below.)

I'm sure, the German media will - understandably - quickly draw comparisons to Abu Ghraib - especially since the Bundeswehr's image already has some not so pleasant spots. Also, questions will be asked about the responsibilities of Bush Schroeder and Rumsfeld Struck (the pictures were taken in 2003). Of course, the media will agree that the image of Germany is severly tarnished because of the acts of a few nuts. All this I believe to happen in the German media.

Also, I believe that Santa Claus will show up in person in December in all Christian households worldwide.

Update 1: I'm afraid, in the interest of historical truth I can't shelter you from this pic... (parental guidance advised). Tags: Germany, Bundeswehr, Afghanistan.

Update 2: More links:
- Video (in English) from Reuters ("German outrage over skull photos")
- Video (in German) about the reaction of Germany's defense minister.

Deja-Vue: Death in German Prison!

Oh No... ALL OVER AGAIN!!!

Pakistanis burn German flag in prison death protest

MULTAN, Pakistan, May 6 (Reuters) - Students from an Islamic seminary in central Pakistan protested on Saturday against the death of a Pakistani in a Berlin jail by burning German flags and vowing to continue his jihad or holy war.

Amir Cheema, 28, died in custody after he was arrested in Germany on March 20 on charges of attempting to kill the editor of a German newspaper, Die Welt, for reprinting cartoons of the Prophet Mohammad first published in Denmark last year. (emphasis added)

Worldwide, more and more people question the authenticity of Germany's commitment to human rights! Many experts ask questions about the complicity of Germany's government! What did German chancellor Merkel know, what did Interior Minister Schäuble know?

It hurts so much to see Germany - of all countries! - abandoning the rule of law! We are disappointed beyond words in Germany!

Of course, memories of Abu Ghraib and Auschwitz come to mind.

Our sympathies are with the poor Pakistani chap who did nothing wrong but was trying to obey his religion's quest for harsh punishment of infidels. We definitely need to understand the root causes of his despair...

Atlantic Review: Abu Ghraib - But Not Darfur

Joerg of Atlantic Review asks:

"Why is the German media reporting again about the horrible Abu Ghraib pictures taken by dishonorable US soldiers, but not about the even more horrible Darfur pictures taken by an honorable former U.S. Marine?"

Read the entire piece. This is one of the most thoughtful articles we've seen in a while. While you are at it, check out the Blog Carnival of German-American Relations, an outstanding event also hosted by Atlantic Review.

Rushing to Judge America: A Blinding German Obsession

(By Ray D.)

In the repeated rush to judge the United States from the moral mountaintops of Europe, most German media have long forgotten Saddam Hussein's reign of terror. A morbid obsession with American crimes, real and perceived, has replaced most authentic concern for international human rights.

And the contrast couldn't be more extreme: While the German government busily promotes German industry at annual trade fairs in Khartoum, the German media quietly looks the other way as the Sudanese government continues its campaign of genocide and ethnic cleansing in Darfur. On the other hand, when previously unseen photos of Abu Ghraib recently emerged, the German media had an absolute field day. SPIEGEL came out with a particularly exploitative cover and finger-wagging editorials popped up like so many mushrooms.

It's much the same with Guantanamo Bay. The American prison has become a perverse national obsession in Germany while most Germans ignore the plight of hundreds-of-thousands imprisoned, abused, tortured, and murdered in North Korean, Russian and Iranian prisons. Where is the balance? Where is the sense of proportion?

In pointing out these contradictions, we need to be very clear on one point: It is not our intent at Davids Medienkritik to quell or discourage discussion on the legitimacy of Guantanamo as a means of dealing with stateless enemy combatants or the very real abuses at Abu Ghraib. The very opposite is true: These are vitally important issues and we believe they must be discussed and debated openly and constructively.

But that isn't happening in Germany. Abu Ghraib and Guantanamo have become little more than populist baseball bats with which leftists media and political elites repeatedly bludgeon the United States and George W. Bush. Why? Because Bush and fellow conservatives represent a massive ideological threat to everything they stand for. Fairness and objectivity have long been replaced by a sick moral relativism, as the cartoon below (from Tagesspiegel) demonstrates:

"I should have also made such pictures of my crimes at Abu Ghraib. Then maybe I also wouldn't have been held accountable..." 

This cartoon is just another example of a media mentality grounded in an array of cynical, flawed assumptions. In this case they include:

  1. The false assertion that President Bush ordered or supported criminal acts at Abu Ghraib and therefore must be held accountable. Unlike Saddam, who knowingly ordered the mass torture and execution of men, women and children, Bush has repeatedly condemned the crimes of American soldiers found guilty of torture and abuse.
  2. The equation of Saddam Hussein's systematic, systemic and intentional mass-murder, torture, invasion and aggression with sporadic abuses committed by US soldiers in clear violation of US law.
  3. The false perception that no one has been held to account for Abu Ghraib. Several soldiers have been charged, sentenced and imprisoned, the commander of Abu Ghraib was demoted.

A lot of well meaning people on both sides of the Atlantic talk about the need for greater dialog. But many of the same people don't understand how much damage the German media is doing. The central question is one of constructive versus destructive criticism. When we look out across the German media landscape over the past three to four years and beyond, we see far too much of the latter and far too little of the former. That has to change. If it doesn't, meaningful dialog will continue to grow increasingly difficult and the German-American partnership will continue to disintegrate.

SPIEGEL: "America's Shame: Torture in the Name of Freedom"

(By Ray D.)

Just when you thought you were safe. SPIEGEL has just released another one of its famous hate-America covers. They really can't help themselves. There is an enormous demand for anti-American innuendo in Germany that is simply too lucrative to pass up. The latest edition is a cynical masterpiece:

"America's Shame: Torture in the Name of Freedom"

Torture in the name of freedom? Since when has America advocated torture as a means of promoting freedom? When someone is tortured or abused in a German jail in violation of established standards, does that mean the German government is torturing in the name of democracy as well? When illegal immigrants suffocate or commit suicide in German custody is that also in the name of democracy? It is as if the United States had never addressed the issue. It is as if the McCain bill torture ban had never been passed by Congress and signed by the President.

This is a dangerously cynical equation of two concepts. Particularly in a Europe where the general public is already so jaded that many no longer believe in the concept of freedom. Why? Because instead of reporting on the systematic violation of human rights in nations like North Korea and Iran the German media finds it necessary to exploit two year old photos of Abu Ghraib for profit (again and again). Never mind that Saddam's Abu Ghraib was a thousand times worse or that hundreds of thousands are starving to death in Kim Jong Il's gulags. There is no need for context in the world of asymmetric journalism.

Germany's Shame: Standing By While Dictators Murder Millions

Germany opposed toppling Saddam and his regime of mass graves. It was not Germany or the UN but the United States that ended the killing in the Balkans. And while SPIEGEL lectures us on "America's Disgrace," the German government is out actively promoting business ties and trade fairs with the Sudanese government as the slaughter in Darfur continues. Ex-Chancellor Schroeder favored lifting the EU arms embargo on China, perhaps the world's most prolific violator of human rights. German efforts to stop Iran's nuclear ambitions have proven to be more of the same impotent diplomatic dupery that too many Europeans support at all costs. In the meantime the Iranians have taken advantage of the stalling to advance their insane ambitions to destroy Israel and threaten the world.

The most disgraceful aspect is that Germany has repeatedly coddled, condoned and even assisted regimes of dictatorship and mass murder despite its own disgraceful national history. And then, in an effort to relativize its own shameful history and diplomatic impotency, German media publications like SPIEGEL pump the numb, jaded audience full of the vile America hate to which so many have become emotionally addicted. The irony of it all is that publications like SPIEGEL would not even have the freedom to print this exploitative trash had it not been for the massive sacrifice in lives, blood and toil of American soldiers to liberate Germany from Fascism and defend it from Communism.

No context. No differentiation. Shock value. Manipulation. Emotionalism. Sensationalism. And then the same publication dares lecture us on the dangers of anti-Americanism.

For that there can be but one word: H-Y-P-O-C-R-I-S-Y

UPDATE: One of our regular commenters had this to say:

"The regulars here know that I consider what happened at Abu Ghraib and elsewhere torture. Spiegel’s latest has nothing to do with opposing torture. How could it? It plays into the hands of the torturers, and pulls the rug out from under those who genuinely oppose torture, and want to stop it once and for all. It is really just so much red meat thrown out to the hordes of pathetic, bitter, envious America-haters who are Spiegel’s “core constituency.” The editors know that anti-Americanism is synonymous with big bucks in Germany. It pays. They’ve been a little reserved in expressing it lately, though, because they know they’re being watched. They don’t want to sacrifice respectability entirely in the pursuit of profit. For that reason, the “new” Abu Ghraib” pictures seemed like a godsend to them. They could strike the all usual phony poses with all the usual fake pathos from the increasingly shaky high ground, and convince themselves no one would call them on it, because, after all, they were “opposing torture.” Their imbecile readers will swallow the bait as usual. Problem is, nobody with a brain is buying it this time around. It’s just to easy to see the money trail leading up to the “moral high ground.” (emphasis ours)

UPDATE #2: If you have the stomach, you can read the entire four-part feature on "America's Shame" on SPIEGEL ONLINE's English site. The sub-headlines tell the entire story, the magazine's objectives remain the same:

Money quote:

"The images from Guantanamo and Abu Ghraib will endure, and they will haunt America for decades to come. A global power can make mistakes and give in to folly, but when its moral foundation begins to crumble, it is constantly forced to deal with the images of its own humiliation and disgrace."

That is what it is really about for SPIEGEL: Long-term humiliation and disgrace for the United States. Abu-Ghraib as the new Mai Lai. This is not about thoughtful, constructive criticism. This is not about genuine, collegial interest in seeing America right its wrongs. This is not about transatlantic dialog and understanding.

This is about a harmful, vindictive rush to the moral high ground at America's expense. Americans should recognize this shameless bashing for what it is and become extremely wary of any and all criticism they hear blaring from across the Atlantic. Americans must begin to tune-out and turn-off the hateful voices that seek only to profit from their misfortune.

By the way, don't ever expect SPIEGEL to dedicate a cover to this story (no it doesn't matter that it's actually current and not over two years old): America's Pride.

Here's a great cartoon from Cox & Forkum.

The image “http://www.coxandforkum.com/archives/06.02.16.Flimflammable-X.gif” cannot be displayed, because it contains errors.

Endnote: For more on this topic, see our recent posting: "Valley of the Wolves Iraq: "Today I hated Americans more than ever." Time for SPIEGEL to go back and reflect on our earlier suggestions, particularly point #6. Politically Incorrect has a highly worthwhile German-language post on reactions to the release of more torture pics. We changed the translation of "Schande" from "disgrace" to "shame" to match SPIEGEL's English translation. Both "disgrace" and "shame" are acceptable translations for "Schande."

Abuse in the German Bundeswehr? Just the Exception...

The German media used the incidents in the Abu Ghraib prison to level serious charges against the American government. It was taken as granted that the abuses in Abu Ghraib by a few criminals happened on direct order of the U.S. government or at least with the tacit approval of Mssrs. Bush and Rumsfeld.

On Friday, January 20, 2006, the report 2004 of the "Wehrbeauftragte" (a kind of ombudsman for the German military) was discussed in the German parliament. Chapter 4, appropriately named "Einzelfälle" (single cases), lists an impressive number of abuses by members of the Bundeswehr. Just to name a few:

A private was confined to a locker by his comrades during his initial tour of duty and doused with water through the ventilation opening. The position of the locker gave the impression that they wanted to push it out the window. After reopening the locker the private’s comrades demanded that he climb on top of the locker and chug two bottles of beer. The private was humiliated by slaps to the face and forced to do push-ups and sleep in puddles of beer and broken glass.

A lieutenant commander beat several soldiers on the thigh, shoulder and back with the end of a cable. On another occasion, he got a first lieutenant in a painful head lock. He further struck a lance-corporal on the upper arm and kicked a petty officer first class in the backside.

A staff sergeant assigned to supervise a training station in a troop drilling area discharged a pistol at close range loaded with maneuver ammunition at another staff sergeant and a private. The private suffered a bruise on the thigh resulting from the shot.

In all these cases mild punishments were handed out. None of the culprits had to go to prison for his deeds. None lost his job in the Bundeswehr.

And nowhere did the German media imply that these incidents were typical for the Bundeswehr. The question of tacit approval of the German government for torture and abuse in the Bundeswehr wasn't even raised.

Well, you know, this is what you would expect from a world class media. No generalizations, no false accusations. Just balanced reporting. After all, this is what good old German journalism is all about, right?

(Translation of cases by Richard Bartholomew)

Continue reading "Abuse in the German Bundeswehr? Just the Exception..." »

Copycat Torture

We didn't have to wait long for this to happen: kids torturing Barbie dolls!

Barbie dolls have become so ubiquitous that they have lost their value to children who maim, burn or microwave them to show their disgust, an academic study claims today.

... "The girls we spoke to see Barbie torture as a legitimate play activity, and see the torture as a 'cool' activity," the researchers said.

The mutilation ranged from cutting off hair to decapitating and putting the dolls in microwaves.

Torture a "legitimate" and "cool" activity? See, George W. Bush, this is where your approval of torture has led the world...

This Day in History: April 15

On April 15, 1945, the Bergen-Belsen concentration camp was liberated by the British,

who were appalled to find most of the 60,000 inmates in critical condition and who were totally unprepared to deal with the situation. During the next five days, 14,000 died, and in the following weeks, another 14,000 succumbed. Bergen-Belsen became the site of a displaced persons' camp, which remained in existence until 1951. Forty-eight former members of the camp staff were tried by the British. Eleven were sentenced to death, including Josef Kramer. They were executed on December 12, 1945. (Source)

Bergenbelsen1
Bergen-Belsen inmates

Bergenbelsen2
Bergen-Belsen SS guards

"Living" conditions in Bergen-Belsen weren't exactly in accordance with the Geneva Convention (which by the way wasn't put into force until 1950):

Beginning in March 1944, Bergen-Belsen gradually became a "regular" concentration camp, the Germans transferring to it, from other camps, prisoners who were classified as "unfit to work." The first group of 1,000 that arrived from Dora were housed in terrible conditions in a new part of the camp; nearly all died quickly and at liberation, only 57 were alive. More transports arrived and most of the prisoners were housed in the former "prisoners' camp." German convicts were also transferred from Dora, to serve as "block elders" and Kapos. They treated the other inmates very brutally.

In August 1944, a women's camp was added. From Buchenwald, 4,000 women prisoners were transferred to the camp and then dispatched to Flossenbuerg. Most of them returned to Bergen-Belsen, sick or exhausted. Women from Plaszow and Auschwitz also were sent to Bergen-Belsen in October 1944, among them Anne Frank and her sister Margot.

At the end of 1944 and early in 1945, a complete deterioration of living conditions set in when thousands of survivors of death marches began to reach the camp. The administration did not even try to house them and a raging typhus epidemic broke out. From January to mid-April 1945, 35,000 prisoners perished.

Here are some gripping testimonies from inmates:

Judy Rosenzwieg:
"Suddenly we were marched into Bergen Belsen, that's where we were taken. In Bergen Belsen it was absolutely the worst of them all. It was not blocks; not organized. It was in the streets. We were just thrown in there between the electric wires, and wherever you could go-you go, and wherever you want to sleep-you sleep. No food. Only once or twice a week they were handing out some of that horrible grass soup."

Shmuel Judkiewitz:
"The horror in that camp is indescribable. Worse than all the other camps."

The Liberation of Bergen Belsen
Judy Rosenzweig:
"All of a sudden out of the blue sky we saw tanks rolling into the camp…We had no idea what kind of tanks they were. Is it the Americans? Is it the Germans? Is it…We just didn't know. We just suddenly panicked…
And loudspeakers started speaking loudly in German and in English:
'You are liberated.'
'We are the English Army - You are liberated.'
'Stay away from danger and stay inside and we'll help you.'
'Stay alive. Try to hang in there. We're here to help you.'
And we knew we were liberated. Needless to say, our feelings were very mixed. So we were liberated. So thank God we are alive. But are we really thankful? Who are we? Where are we going to go? What are we? Nothing. That's okay, we're alive."

Josef Rosensaft:
"Bergen Belsen, or Belsen, is a double symbol in the history of the years after the second World War; it is not just the name of a town in Northern Germany.
The name 'Belsen' invokes tremor in Jews' hearts. Belsen is engraved in the Jewish consciousness as one of the most cursed places in Germany, where the bones of tens of thousands of Jewish victims are buried. The Belsen camp is, in Jews' memories and in the memories of all people in the world, a camp of starvation, and unbelievable filth which caused diseases and plagues. Belsen has become a symbol of man's inhumanity to man.
On the other hand, Belsen is also the camp that was liberated on April 15, 1945, and then became a symbol for renewal and rebirth, and the 'return to life' of the survivors."

It should be noted that the German media these days report extensively on the liberation of Bergen-Belsen. Still, some go the extra mile: the conservative daily FAZ presents on April 15 a large painted picture of inmates being brutally beaten by guards.

In Abu Ghraib.

(Hat tip Michele)

Our Mission

The Debate

Radical Islam

Support Medienkritik

Awards

  • The 2006 Weblog Awards

Recent Comments

May 2008

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
        1 2 3
4 5 6 7 8 9 10
11 12 13 14 15 16 17
18 19 20 21 22 23 24
25 26 27 28 29 30 31

Categories

Stats

Recommended Reading

Search